Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.

Author: Zulusar Kasho
Country: Grenada
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 10 July 2007
Pages: 500
PDF File Size: 20.65 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.70 Mb
ISBN: 183-3-61398-661-6
Downloads: 47621
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faunris

In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.

Retrieved from ” https: It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models.

TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF

SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers.

DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF.

In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. The DM2 defines doadf data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.


Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:. As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that bolume completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently 20.

way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development.

One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.

It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.

Systems and services view SV is a volmue of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions.

Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, 2.00 techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.

These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means. DoD Business Systems Modernization: While it oddaf clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.


There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. Commons category link is on Wikidata. As one example, the DoDAF v1. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed.

Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts.

The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness. It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter.

These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, volumw facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and vooume.

The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i.